Working with open argument corpora
نویسندگان
چکیده
AIFdb Corpora provides a facility to group Argument Interchange Format (AIF) argument maps and search for maps that are related to each other (for example, analyses of related texts.) Users can create and share corpora containing any number of argument maps from within AIFdb. By integrating with the OVA+ analysis tool, AIFdb Corpora allows for the creation of corpora compliant with both AIF and Inference Anchoring Theory, a philosophically and linguistically grounded counterpart to AIF.
منابع مشابه
Debbie, the Debate Bot of the Future
Chatbots are a rapidly expanding application of dialogue systems with companies switching to bot services for customer support, and new applications for users interested in casual conversation. One style of casual conversation is argument; many people love nothing more than a good argument. Moreover, there are a number of existing corpora of argumentative dialogues, annotated for agreement and ...
متن کاملExtraction of Predicate-Argument Structures from Texts
We consider extraction of predicate-argument structures from a single text with a substantial narrative part. Working with such texts rather than large corpora requires detailed syntactic analyses, a learning mechanism and a cooperating user who confirms automatically generated results. We describe a system with such capabilities. The system has been tested on a variety of texts and has recentl...
متن کاملThe NITE XML Toolkit: Demonstration from five corpora
The NITE XML Toolkit (NXT) is open source software for working with multimodal, spoken, or text language corpora. It is specifically designed to support the tasks of human annotators and analysts of heavily cross-annotated data sets, and has been used successfully on a range of projects with varying needs. In this text to accompany a demonstration, we describe NXT along with four uses on differ...
متن کاملEvidently epistential adverbs are argumentative indicators: A corpus-based study
Argumentative indicators of discourse relations constitute crucial cues for the mining of arguments. However, a comprehensive lexicon of these linguistic devices is so far lacking due to the scarcity of corpora argumentatively annotated and the absence of an empirically validated analytic methodology. Recent studies have shown that modals, that express that things might be otherwise, and eviden...
متن کاملA Comprehensive Resource to Evaluate Complex Open Domain Question Answering
We describe two corpora of question and answer pairs collected for complex, open-domain Question Answering (QA) to enable answer classification and re-ranking experiments. We deliver manually annotated answers to non-factoid questions from a QA system on both Web and TREC data. Moreover, we provide the same question/answer pairs in a rich data representation that includes syntactic parse trees ...
متن کامل